[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
rss
UniRSS
..
:: Volume 35, Issue 2 (9-2019) ::
QJOE 2019, 35(2): 61-82 Back to browse issues page
The Developmental Path of Internship Program within the Iranian System of Teacher Training
Gh. Ahmadi , S. Maleki , M. Mehrmohammadi , S.M.R. EmaamJom’eh
Abstract:   (3554 Views)
Theoretically, internship programs can utilize any one of the three known approaches: craft model, applied science model, and reflective model. The purpose of the current paper has been to show the developmental path of approaches to internship during the century-old history of Iranian teacher training programs. Perusal of the available documents reveals that initially the apprenticeship approach has been used for up to 70 years. Then the applied science approach is utilized, ever so inadequately. The use of the reflective approach is the hallmark of the Farhangiyan University charter, adopted since 2013. However, the data collected herein show that the present approach suffers from the lack of much characteristics expected from the reflective approach.   
 
 
Keywords: practicum, craft model, applied science model, reflective model, levels of reflection
Full-Text [PDF 629 kb]   (4992 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2019/03/12 | Accepted: 2019/08/11 | Published: 2019/09/18
References
1. Get persistent links for your reference list or bibliography. Copy and paste the list, we’ll match with our metadata and return the links. Members may also deposit reference lists here too. Dewey, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. In C. A. McMurry (Ed.), The third yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education. Part I. (pp. 9-30). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Available at: https://archive.org/details/r00elationoftheorynatirich
2. _____________. (1933). How we think. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
3. Eisner, E. W. (2002). From episteme to phronesis to artistry in the study and improvement of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(4), 375-385. [DOI:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00004-5]
4. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055. [DOI:10.1111/0161-4681.00141]
5. Gutek, G. L. (2005). Historical and philosophical foundations of education: A biographical introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
6. Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49. [DOI:10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U]
7. Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 73-85. [DOI:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00051-8]
8. Lane, R., McMaster, H., Adnum, J., & Cavanagh, M. (2014). Quality reflective practice in teacher education: A journey towards shared understanding. Reflective Practice, 15(4), 481-494. [DOI:10.1080/14623943.2014.900022]
9. Larrivee, B. (2008). Development of a tool to assess teachers' level of reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 9(3), 341-360. [DOI:10.1080/14623940802207451]
10. Nguyen, Q. D., Fernandez, N., Karsenti, T., & Charlin, B. (2014). What is reflection? A conceptual analysis of major definitions and a proposal of a five-component model. Medical Education, 48(12), 1176-1189. [DOI:10.1111/medu.12583]
11. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
12. _____________. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Stephens, P., Tønnessen, F. E., & Kyriacou, C. (2004). Teacher training and teacher education in England and Norway: A comparative study of policy goals. Comparative Education, 40(1), 109-130. [DOI:10.1080/0305006042000184908]
14. Ulvik, M., & Smith, K. (2011). What characterizes a good practicum in teacher education? Education Inquiry, 2(3), 517-536. [DOI:10.3402/edui.v2i3.21997]
15. Van Manen, M. J. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205-228. [DOI:10.1080/03626784.1977.11075533]
16. Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press.
17. Ward, J. R., & McCotter, S. S. (2004). Reflection as a visible outcome for preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 243-257. [DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.004]
18. Wilson, E. K. (2006). The impact of an alternative model of student teacher supervision: Views of the participants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 22-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2005.07.007]
19. Zeichner, K. M. (1983). Alternative paradigms of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 3-9. [DOI:10.1177/002248718303400302]
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ahmadi G, Maleki S, Mehrmohammadi M, EmaamJom’eh S. The Developmental Path of Internship Program within the Iranian System of Teacher Training. QJOE 2019; 35 (2) :61-82
URL: http://qjoe.ir/article-1-1810-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 35, Issue 2 (9-2019) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه تعلیم و تربیت Quarterly Journal of Education
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645