[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
rss
UniRSS
..
:: Volume 35, Issue 4 (3-2020) ::
QJOE 2020, 35(4): 131-151 Back to browse issues page
Academic Achievement as a Function of Goal Orientation and Course Perception Mediated by Academic Self-Regulation
H. Baabaazaadeh , D. HosseyniNasab, Ph.D. , S. Livaarjaani, Ph.D.
Abstract:   (3846 Views)
To help with the prediction of school achievement through a mathematical model incorporating goal orientation, course perception, and academic self-regulation, a sample of 380 9th graders in Tabriz was selected using the cluster sampling method. Instruments used to measure these constructs were translated ones. Data analyses showed that goal orientation and course perception have a direct impact on achievement. Indirect impact of three of the goal orientation constituents is through cognitive and metacognitive strategies while the fourth one has no such impact. From among the constituents of course perception, interest has an indirect impact through the cognitive and metacognitive strategies while the other three have positive indirect impact through cognitive strategies only. Overall, the goal orientation factor proved to be a better predictor of school achievement.
Keywords: goal orientation, course perception, academic self-regulation, academic achievement
Full-Text [PDF 740 kb]   (1770 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/08/20 | Accepted: 2018/12/29 | Published: 2020/03/10
References
1. Get persistent links for your reference list or bibliography. Copy and paste the list, we’ll match with our metadata and return the links. Members may also deposit reference lists here too. Al-Baddareen, G., Ghaith, S., & Akour, M. (2015). Self-efficacy, achievement goals, and metacognition as predictors of academic motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2068-2073. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.345]
2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261]
3. Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997).Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(3), 269-298. [DOI:10.1006/ceps.1996.0926]
4. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 397-413. [DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.008]
5. Bembenutty, H. (2009). Academic delay of gratification, self-regulation of learning, gender differences, and expectancy-value. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(3), 347-352. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.028]
6. Buhrau, D., & Sujan, M. (2015). Temporal mindsets and self-regulation: The motivation and implementation of self-regulatory behaviors. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 231-244. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.003]
7. Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S.L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 43-54. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.43]
8. Daniel, G. R., Wang, C., & Berthelsen, D. (2016). Early school-based parent involvement, children's self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An Australian longitudinal study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 168-177. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.016]
9. Daniela, P. (2015). The relationship between self-regulation, motivation and performance at secondary school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2549-2553. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.410]
10. Diseth, A., & Kobbeltvedt, T. (2010). A mediation analysis of achievement motives, goals, learning strategies, and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 671-687. [DOI:10.1348/000709910X492432]
11. Dorman, J. P., Fisher, D.L., & Waldrip, B.G. (2006). Learning environments, attitudes, efficacy and perceptions of assessment: A LISREL analysis. In D.L. Fisher, & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments (pp. 1-28). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. [DOI:10.1142/9789812774651_0001]
12. Dupeyrat, C., & Marine, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck's model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 43-59. [DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.007]
13. Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating the "classic" and "contemporary" approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In P. Pintrich & M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 143-179). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14. Elliot, A.J., & Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461]
15. Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Gable, S. L. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549-563. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.549]
16. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501]
17. Geitz, G., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Kirschner, P. A. (2016). Changing learning behavior: Self-efficacy and goal orientation in PBL groups in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 146-158. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.11.001]
18. Gentry, M., Gable, R.K., & Rizza, M.G. (2002). Students' perceptions of classroom activities: Are there grade-level and gender differences. Journal of Education and Psychology, 94(3), 539-544. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.539]
19. Graham, S., & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 187-194. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.187]
20. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin's model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 334-372. [DOI:10.3102/003465430303953]
21. Jakešová, J., & Kalenda, J. (2015). Self-regulated learning: Critical-realistic conceptualization. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 178-189. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.105]
22. Javed, T., & Aslam Asghar, M. (2017). Association of classroom environment with academic achievement of secondary school girls in Pakistan. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, 8(2), 121-127. [DOI:10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n2p121]
23. Jury, M., Smeding, A., Court, M., & Darnon, C. (2015). When first-generation students succeed at university: On the link between social class, academic performance, and performance-avoidance goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 25-36. [DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.001]
24. Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M.L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 141-184. [DOI:10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5]
25. Kaplan, A., Lichtinger, E., & Gorodetsky, M. (2009). Achievement goal orientations and self-regulation in writing: An integrative perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 51-69. [DOI:10.1037/a0013200]
26. LaRocque, M. (2008).Assessing perceptions of the environment in elementary classrooms: The link with achievement. Educational Psychology in Practice, 24(4), 289-305. [DOI:10.1080/02667360802488732]
27. Luo, W., Hogan, D. & Paris, S. G. (2011). Predicting Singapore students' achievement goals in their English study: Self-construal and classroom goal structure. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 526-535. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.002]
28. Matuga, J. M. (2009). Self-regulation, goal orientation, and academic achievement of secondary students in online university courses. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 4-11.
29. McWhaw, K. & Abrami, P. C. (2001). Student goal orientation and interest: Effects on students' use of self-regulated learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(3), 311-329. [DOI:10.1006/ceps.2000.1054]
30. Paris, S. G., & Winogard, P. (2003). The role of self-regulated learning in contextual teaching: Principles and practices for teacher preparation. Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED),Washington, DC.
31. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544-555. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544]
32. Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Meher, & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp.371-402). Greenwich, CT: JAL Press.
33. Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, P. H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents' motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437-460. [DOI:10.3102/00028312038002437]
34. Seaton, M., Parker, P., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Seeshing Yeung, A. (2014). The reciprocal relations between self-concept, motivation and achievement: Juxtaposing academic self-concept and achievement goal orientations for mathematics success. Educational Psychology, 34(1), 49-72. [DOI:10.1080/01443410.2013.825232]
35. Schunk, D.H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 85-94. [DOI:10.1207/s15326985ep4002_3]
36. Shkullaku, R. (2013). The relationship between self-efficacy and academic performance in the context of gender among Albanian students. European Academic Research, 1(4), 467-478.
37. Sinclair B.B., & Fraser, B. J. (2002). Changing classroom environments in urban middle schools. Learning Environments Research, 5(3), 301-328. [DOI:10.1023/A:1021976307020]
38. Sunger, S. & Güngören, S. (2009). The role of classroom environment perceptions in self-regulated learning and science achievement. Elementary Education Online, 8(3), 883-900.
39. Wolters, C.A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation, cognition and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236-250. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236]
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Baabaazaadeh H, HosseyniNasab, Ph.D. D, Livaarjaani, Ph.D. S. Academic Achievement as a Function of Goal Orientation and Course Perception Mediated by Academic Self-Regulation. QJOE 2020; 35 (4) :131-151
URL: http://qjoe.ir/article-1-2092-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 35, Issue 4 (3-2020) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه تعلیم و تربیت Quarterly Journal of Education
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660