[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
rss
UniRSS
..
:: Volume 35, Issue 1 (6-2019) ::
QJOE 2019, 35(1): 9-30 Back to browse issues page
Design and Validation of an Instructional Design Model for Reflection-Based Learning Environments 
E. Azimi, Ph.D. , J. Haatami, Ph.D. , H. FarDaanesh, Ph.D. , O. Noroozi, Ph.D.
Abstract:   (4304 Views)
Reflection on teaching is a known method of learning to teach. Reflection is a form of thinking wherein improvement is sought through self-observation. Recent approaches to teaching practicums have gravitated towards reflective ones. However, there are no exact models for the design and implementation of reflection-based practicum. In this study with a social constructivist perspective, the validity of one such model is explored. The basic elements of the instructional situation, i.e. conditions, methods, and results, along with the implementation stages of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation constitute the chosen model. A group of 5 educational technologists initially studied the model from an instructional design perspective. Then a group of 4 teacher educators, as users of the model, were asked to design a sample teaching situation using the given model. The feedback given by the two groups was used to improve the model in four rounds of validation. The final version of the model gained an approval measure of %88 by the two groups.

 
Keywords: reflection, practicum, instructional design, learning environment design, teaching methods, internal validation
Full-Text [PDF 851 kb]   (1802 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/05/28 | Accepted: 2018/09/9 | Published: 2019/05/30
References
1. Members may also deposit reference lists here too. Allen, J. M., & Wright, S. E. (2014). Integrating theory and practice in the pre-service teacher education practicum. Teachers and Teaching, 20(2), 136-151. [DOI:10.1080/13540602.2013.848568]
2. Azimi, E., Hatami, J., Fradanesh, H., & Noorozi, O. (2018). Barriers of implementing lesson study in practicum courses to improve the quality of reflection of student teachers. Teacher Education Policy in Europe Network (2018) (pp. 85-86). Braga, Portugal: University of Minho. Retrieved from www.tepe2018.com
3. Azimi, E., Kuusisto, E., Tirri, K., & Hatami, J. (2018). The quality of student teachers' reflection on their practice through the use of guided reflective narrative method. Teacher Education Policy in Europe Network (2018) (pp. 84-85). Braga, Portugal: University of Minho. Retrieved from www.tepe2018.com
4. Clarà, M. (2015). What is reflection? Looking for clarity in an ambiguous notion. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 261-271. [DOI:10.1177/0022487114552028]
5. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process, Vol. 8. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath & Co Publishers.
6. Gelfuso, A., & Dennis, D. V. (2014). Getting reflection off the page: The challenges of developing support structures for pre-service teacher reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 1-11. [DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2013.10.012]
7. Hamann, D. T. (2015). The construction and validation of an M-learning framework for online and blended learning environments. Nova Southeastern University. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (38), 201.
8. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23-48. [DOI:10.1007/BF02319856]
9. Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers and Education, 56(2), 403-417. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.024]
10. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.92.1562 [DOI:10.4324/9781410600523]
11. ____________. (2016). Pedagogy of teacher education. In J. Loughran, & M. L. Hamilton (Eds.), International handbook of teacher education (pp. 311-346). Springer Singapore. [DOI:10.1007/978-981-10-0366-0_8]
12. Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1020-1041. [DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.022]
13. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. [DOI:10.2307/2529310]
14. La Velle, L. (2013). Masterliness in the teaching profession: Global issues and local developments. Journal of Education for Teaching, 39(1), 2-8. [DOI:10.1080/02607476.2012.733186]
15. Lee, J., & Jang, S. (2014). A methodological framework for instructional design model development: Critical dimensions and synthesized procedures. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(6), 743-765. [DOI:10.1007/s11423-014-9352-7]
16. Lee, J., Lim, C., & Kim, H. (2017). Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 427-453. [DOI:10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1]
17. Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 43-62. [DOI:10.1007/BF02299633]
18. Marcos, J. M., Sanchez, E., & Tillema, H. H. (2011). Promoting teacher reflection: What is said to be done. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 21-36. [DOI:10.1080/02607476.2011.538269]
19. Mattsson, M., Eilertsen, T. V., & Rorrison, D. (2011). What is practice in teacher education? In M. Mattsson, T. V. Eilertsen, & D. Rorrison (Eds.), A practicum turn in teacher education (pp. 1-15). Roterdam: Sense. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-6091-711-0_1]
20. Nguyen, Q. D., Fernandez, N., Karsenti, T., & Charlin, B. (2014). What is reflection? A conceptual analysis of major definitions and a proposal of a five-component model. Medical Education, 48(12), 1176-1189. [DOI:10.1111/medu.12583]
21. Nutbrown, S., Higgins, C., Beesley, S. (2016). Measuring the impact of high quality instant feedback on learning. Practitioner Research in Higher Education Journal, 10(1), 130-139.
22. Quinton, S., & Smallbone, T. (2010). Feeding forward: Using feedback to promote student reflection and learning - a teaching model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 125-135. [DOI:10.1080/14703290903525911]
23. Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design: What is it and why is it? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: Vol. 1. An overview of their current status (pp. 3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [DOI:10.4324/9780203824283]
24. Richey, R. C. (2005). Validating instructional design models. In J. M. Spector, & D. A. Wiley (Eds.), Innovations in instructional technology: Essays in honor of M. David Merrill (pp. 171-185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
25. Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2009). Design and development research. New York: Routledge.
26. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
27. Tracey, M. W., & Richey, R. C. (2007). ID model construction and validation: A multiple intelligences case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(4), 369-390. [DOI:10.1007/s11423-006-9015-4]
28. Zeichner, K. M. (1996). Designing educative practicum experiences for prosepctive teachers. In K. Zeichner, S. Melnick, & M. L. Gomez (Eds.), Currents of reform in preservice teacher education (pp. 215-234). New York: Teachers College Press.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Azimi, Ph.D. E, Haatami, Ph.D. J, FarDaanesh, Ph.D. H, Noroozi, Ph.D. O. Design and Validation of an Instructional Design Model for Reflection-Based Learning Environments . QJOE 2019; 35 (1) :9-30
URL: http://qjoe.ir/article-1-1590-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 35, Issue 1 (6-2019) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه تعلیم و تربیت Quarterly Journal of Education
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645